Hi, redirecting to copr-devel On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 09:18 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 15:15 +0200, Rajeesh K V wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error: > > > > Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed > > > > For instance see the build log > > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-k > > de-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc22/root.log > > > > > > > Known issue, should be fixed later today when Bodhi is activated for > Fedora 23. I still have those failures in fedora-23-ppc64le [1] and fedora-rawhide-ppc64le buildroots . Should we open bug reports in bugzilla , product Copr [3] ? [1] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_diffview/fedora-23-ppc64le/00109173-patchutils/root.log DEBUG util.py:377: Error: Package tar-1.28-6.fc23.ppc64le.rpm is not signed [2] https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sergiomb/patchutils_with_diffview/fedora-rawhide-ppc64le/00109173-patchutils/root.log DEBUG util.py:377: Error: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit) needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le. DEBUG util.py:377: nothing provides libsemanage.so.1()(64bit) needed by shadow-utils-2:4.2.1-2.fc23.ppc64le DEBUG util.py:488: Child return code was: 1 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Copr Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct