Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:13:18AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

> It is first version and I'm sure there will be some false negatives. The
> current logic is:
> 1. query FAS to get all usernames from packager group who are sponsors
> 2. for each such user get all bugs from past 365 day for Package Review
> component which are assigned to this sponsor
> 3. give the sponsor some credit when he changed bug status (to whatever
> state) as this indicate some work on this bug
> 4. give the sponsor some credit if he remove FE-NEEDSPONSOR from blocking
> bugs as this indicate finishing sponsor work

I think the script should also consider comments to needsponsor bugs as
sponsoring work, even if the bug was not yet assigned to someone. And
IMHO the wording should be a little bit more friendly, e.g. "no recent
sponsor activity" instead of "no sponsor work".

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux