Re: [Fedora-packaging] Is it time to allow Chromium in Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To understand the work this has created for Debian users and
maintainers, you may want to review this bug report which has ultimately
been traced to bundled library issues:

https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=501318

Hey Daniel,

Thanks...Sorry, I had missed your post earlier; and it's clear it isn't the 
friendliest application for packaging in a Linux distro; but progress is
slowly being made.  

On the positive side, for those who'd like to give it a spin, Tom's copr is great.  
If you're coming from Chrome, it's a fairly seamless transition.  Everything just works 
(at least as far as I can tell); and it looks and acts identical.  Extensions are all there, 
PepperFlash, no issues.  If you've already got Chrome, just:

ln -s /opt/google/chrome-unstable/PepperFlash/libpepflashplayer.so /usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/
ln -s /opt/google/chrome-unstable/PepperFlash/manifest.json /usr/lib64/chromium-browser/PepperFlash/

It's impressive.  He really did an excellent job.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux