Hi . My > understanding though is that > it's a much larger change than what we're discussing > (e.g. you can't use > existing .spec files), and while it has some similar > goals in some > areas, it isn't exactly the same thing. No. its not. Its just something to keep in mind for a later development perhaps. I just mentioned it because it seems close to whats being discussed here. If you want to looking for better ways to build rpms conary is not probably what you want ===== Regards Rahul Sundaram __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com