On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:34:56PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Aug 5, 2015 2:55 AM, "Miroslav Lichvar" <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Are you looking to do this for F23 branch and rawhide or just rawhide > > > and have it land in F24 when it is ready? Or is that still to be > > > determined. > > > > I was thinking about doing this in rawhide only with no > > ncurses-specific rebuilds. After the next mass rebuild everything > > that didn't FTBFS should be using the ABI 6 libs. > If you can provide both versions, I don't see a reason to not provide it in > Fedora 23 branch too. We could just not force a rebuild in the branch and > do that only in rawhide. I'm not sure, it seems odd to me to have packages in a Fedora release which change their dependencies (e.g. libncurses.so.5 -> libncurses.so.6) after rebuild. Are others ok with that? -- Miroslav Lichvar -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
