Re: gpg keys of older/newer fedora versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 12:58:36PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On 7/18/15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I thought I'd ask here first: is there a strong reason *not* to include
> > those keys?
> 
> It's not recommended to encourage end users installing EOL releases.
> 
> However a seperate package for gpg keys from EOL releases is OK.
> 
> But is it worthwhile to move these keys out from mock?
I think it is, for two reasons:
1. keys in mock are in a mock specific directory, so dnf doesn't know
   about them. I'd like things to work out-of-the-box, without the
   need to manually adjusts paths or copy keys around.
2. mock is at a higher level in the stack. It has different purpose,
   gives privileges to some users, has additional functionality, etc.
   Mock also pulls in some packaging tools, including both dnf and yum.

Zbyszek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux