Re: [HEADS UP] rpm-4.12.90 in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Florian Festi <ffesti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Also we still need to settle to a final syntax for the operators
> > [1]. Unfortunately there is no consensus among the other packaging
> > formats what to use. Right now rpm accepts 3 different styles:
> >  * AND OR IF ELSE
> >  * & | ? :
> >  * && || ? :
> > But the final release will only support on of them. As soon as the
> > alpha stops eating babies that's a discussion we need to have.
> 
> ​Is there a reason why we can't maintain all three kinds?

Languages that support many alternative syntax variants tend to get
difficult to read. Different programmers will use different syntaxes
and then have trouble reading each other's code. It's a lot of pain for
very little gain.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgp6KzQ6hcXu7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux