On July 29, 2015 7:36:07 AM PDT, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hello, > >There is a report of an issue with the boot.iso and DVD isos not >booting on 32-bit machines/VMs because of a kernel issue [1]. As far >as is known, the issue doesn't happen on 64-bit. It may happen on >32-bit ARM but that is not confirmed as the ARM issue manifests >differently. The bug needs help. > >First, it would be good to isolate it to the first kernel that doesn't >work. That narrows down the range of commits to look at for the bug. > >Secondly, it would be excellent if someone could commit to spinning >test ISOs when requested. Turn around time on bugs like this are >quite lengthy given that they often require building a new kernel >package, and then spinning a custom ISO with that package included. >Ideally the ISO content would not change from spin to spin other than >the kernel, to eliminate variables. > >If you would like to help with this, please CC yourself on the bug. >Please avoid chiming in on the bug with "me too" style comments >though, as that makes the bug harder to follow. > >josh > >[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382 >-- >devel mailing list >devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct I've been handling this for Josh today. I don't think we need anything else now. I've identified the last working kernel (the issue appeared between 4.1rc5 and 4.1rc6) and will test any proposed fixes too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
