Re: Emacs packaging guidelines (was: Re: Fedora minimal installations)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:03:00PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> >> "The Emacs add-on packaging guidelines no longer stipulate that packages which
> >> also bundle support for Emacs should split out those Emacs files into separate
> >> sub-packages. This package should instead ship those files with the main
> >> package which should also Require emacs-filesystem. See
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs for more detail."
> > And once again the wording is weak. It says "should". Three times even.
> What's wrong with the word "should"? What am I missing? Seems like the
> usual use of this word to me?

Presuambly this: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux