On 29.07.2015 16:09, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 03:42:28PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: >> In order to define the Base WG core package group and minimize minimal >> installations for e.g. cloud images and the atomic spin, I created some >> dependency lists: >> >> There are so many definitions of minimum sets: >> >> systemd: container boot >> systemd + bash + login: container boot with login >> systemd + kernel + bootloader + dracut: machine boot >> systemd + ... + sshd + firewalld: network minimal >> >> Here is a little script to generate the filelist (which apparently is extended >> by dnf and kickstart with other default packages): >> <https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/pkgset.sh> >> >> So, if we start with systemd, then we'll get 112 packages at least for rawhide. >> systemd (112 pkgs): >> <https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/f24-systemd-requires.txt> >> >> systemd+kernel+grub2+grub2-efi+grubby+dracut (142 pkgs): >> <https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/f24-systemd-kernel-requires.txt> >> >> systemd+kernel+grub2+grub2-efi+grubby+dracut+dnf (177 pkgs): >> https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/f24-systemd-kernel-dnf-requires.txt >> >> >> For a visualization I created some graphs for the systemd only dependencies: >> >> <https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/systemd-all.svg> >> >> and a reduced graph, which only displays one dep: >> >> <https://harald.fedorapeople.org/pkgset/systemd.svg> >> >> >> A couple of strange deps: >> - libsemanage requires python >> (filed as <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248002>) >> - emacs-filesystem - do we really need that? > That's a package with three directories... Guidelines require this dependency. > >> - info - do we really require that for every package, that ships info pages? > This could be converted to a scheme where info (install-info precisely speaking) > is not required, and is only called if it is present. And the info package > would have to install all pre-exisiting info pages upon installation. > (Something like this is done with gtk-update-icon-cache [1].) > info.rpm is rather small, so I doubt that this is worth the effort. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache and with %transfiletriggerin this could even be automated from within the info package. <http://rpm.org/wiki/FileTriggers> %transfiletriggerin -- %{_infodir} while read -r file || [ -n "$line" ]; do /sbin/install-info "$file" %{_infodir}/dir || : done %transfiletriggerpostun -- %{_infodir} while read -r file || [ -n "$line" ]; do /sbin/install-info --delete "$file" %{_infodir}/dir || : done And we could just drop all the %post and %preun from the other zillion spec files. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
