2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05 +10:00: >> Should I make the doc packages arch specific? > > Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on > every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing battle), could you just > build the doc subpackage on only one arch? > > %ifarch x86_64 > %package doc > BuildArch: noarch > ... > %endif This looks like a very wise way of handling it. Actually, while debugging it, I found that the translated documentation was not being properly generated, and after fixing it, it would take like 3 to 4 times longer to generate docs, and doc generation was already almost 80% of the package build time... > I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it should > therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches. In the worst case, it would generate -doc packages only for x86_64, where most users interested on reading it would be using. > -- > Dan Callaghan <dcallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations > Red Hat, Inc. Thanks! I will try this way :) Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
