Dne 27.7.2015 v 13:51 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > On 2015-07-27, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Dne 27.7.2015 v 12:00 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a): >>> You can say the same about perl-srpm-macros, ocaml-srpm-macros or >>> other *-srpm-macros package redhat-rpm-config has as a runtime >>> dependency. >> Yes, and I say that about them. You can ask Perl maintainers at minimum. >> The worst thing is that you already take them as an excuse to not do the >> right thing :/ >> > Sometimes you need macros in minimal build root to influence resulting > source pacakges. My initial proposal removes the need for this macros being available for building SRPM I have not tested it though). I don't dispute the rest you said :) Vít > Then the macros will be always available for everyone > anytime regardless being deliery by redhat-rpm-config or any other > package. > > My reasoning for having specific macros in specific package instead of in > redhat-rpm-config is that it separates responsibility and > accountibility. If something goes wrong, locating the real cause by > comparing build root listing is easier than diffing redhat-rpm-config > files. Also letting tens of people commit into redhat-rpm-config does > not sound for me correct and safe. > > -- Petr > -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
