-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dne 23.7.2015 v 21:23 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Thursday, July 23, 2015 09:44:58 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 22.7.2015 v 21:43 opensource@xxxxxxxxx napsal(a): >>> rubygem-git-up jvcelak 62 weeks ago >> >> This is actually interesting piece. This might or might not be FTBFS. >> This package was not touched by mass rebuild scripts, since it contains >> "noautobuild" file [1, 2], which (although not mentioned in F23 mass >> rebuild page [3]) is apparently honored. So this package should not be >> retired IMO and I am wondering how many other similar packages we have >> in Fedora. >> >> Till, would you mind to improve your script? >> >> Actually I am not sure what is the state of "noautobuild". It is not >> mentioned in F23 mass rebuild notes [3] at all, for F21 there is >> mentioned opt-out [4] but the actual section is missing. For F20 - F15 >> was opt-out probably disabled [5]. > > opt out was disabled in the f21 mass rebuild. but was not disabled in any > other rebuild. Well, the mass rebuild pages says otherwise, you can take F20 as an example: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild#Opting_Out But this might be just Copy/Paste issue. > if you have the noautobuild file in place the onus is on you to > build the package yourself. Perhaps we should remove all ability to opt out. +1 for removing the opt-out. Or does anybody have any valid reason for not rebuilding his/her packages? I don't think "The rubygem-git-up package is noarch, rebuild is usualy not needed." is good justification. > > > in this case I think retiring the package is the right thing to do unless it > is rebuilt. Till removed the "noautobuild" and rebuilt the package, so problem solved for this instance. Vít -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVshlyAAoJEAzgnueZF7h8TrsP/3fMAExlQMD+zVY88AtNoQr/ QwC7gZ2IOLNRmDZs4D88b3gCnZMmecZoSt8WsncN+98/Fzpot9hLTlT5wV0tGhMV xMFSkVKJ0ew20QXUgCBqjwq0kdYrlWS2BLexjtt5ZiGpr+WOrWIPZAYygXYtPkOK hdWUVMPYcAnxgPgyz91t3IkcZF+LcmSpmKCfhIg66uLZ5QOaUda1NYc6D+r0dFE7 nHYMVTSUqSbah+koWj1GFUIsnhIMhsWCEUZM2nMMSnYHVD7DL1+EOcc8udNHL7/h ZLRMm422eO5uFP89Mui2bfxKL7yWyceS6UHViaap3z91OhgyuPmcbIouW243h6Gu uCPgR4sazEZD4eza6P3LQvNeanOGfAy1CQGfKH5dxk6G31EEWkxehLlmg31McJRT CEOz32K8kjKUxg49EooBdbxMgbIopZm9BNfQGepNA0vg3WXBS0J/bKh0UZhiMNs6 x5kBPJiFHRGqUcY/CkG7u/kpknzeinBbabNTpv9eYMW3yTwlaGe1urbWfz4u/4O7 gyCaplnm34x6MtsqqhmVqG0vQXFZhYVVqlmafucAEgtiQ8IrANTa571andmdXnw3 jIxcCVOK0TShKtDP267eKE8rIZQ6zPqZxz4JKO7W9m0hCoi+LGbneyjPj6Fu8xjo L0DSo/e7mnRn2zgQvY6V =oM1K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
