Re: Boost updated to 1.58.0 in rawhide and f23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 14:39 -0700, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 07/23/2015 02:33 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > Is this a general failure in f23-boost, or just a few packages?
> 
> The f23-boost target tag is using build tag f23-build!
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=150
> 
> vs f24-boost has itself for both build and destination tag:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=154

Thanks for spotting this - I reported it to dgilmore and he fixed it.
All the builds that were run in f23-boost will need to be re-done (with
a release bump).

I tagged libreoffice-5.0.0.3-2.fc23 from f23-boost into f23. If
anyone's wondering why - yes it didn't actually build against boost
1.58, but it *did* build against the updated poppler, and we needed a
rebuild against the updated poppler for F23 Alpha TC composes. LO
builds take so goddamn long it seemed a shame to waste one. I'll kick
off a re-rebuild in f23-boost now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux