On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 16:18 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > Also, the timing is really unfortunate. The update should have > happened > before F-23 branch-off, not a week after it :-) Now every package has > to > be rebuilt twice. It's also unfortunate from another angle. We're trying to build Fedora 23 Alpha composes and we're already late; this landed just as anaconda and the compose toolchain was more or less ready, and caused a bunch of dependency issues which break installs and live image creation. It seems odd to land the new build into the F23 and Rawhide repos and *then* set up a side tag to do rebuilds. What's the point of that? The usual way a side tag is used is that the new boost is built *in the side tag* and all the package rebuilds are also done in the side tag; then the new boost and the packages built against it can be tagged into the main repo together, without disrupting things. I don't see that having a side tag for rebuilds against an soname bump that's already in the main repo achieves anything at all. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
