On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: >>> >>> Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to >>> improve Fedora for developers. >>> Just contents are missing. >> >> >> Under "The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora >> and ready to use!" would it be worth mentioning C and C++? >> >> GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and we >> ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any >> other compiler. >> >> There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited >> by shiny dynamic languages ;-) >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > > Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing "Fedora is made for > developers". It implies that we don't do anything to make it great for > non-developers, which is not true at all. Is there a better way we can word > this? The site is specifically targeted at developers. The URL will likely be something like developers.fedoraproject.org. This isn't a generic, front-page site. Given the targeted nature of it, I think it's perfectly fine to say Fedora is built for developers. I mean, you wouldn't want a developer coming to this page and seeing "Fedora is built for everyone" and then a bunch of text explaining that. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
