Re: Hosting End-Of-Life Fedora Base images?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Isn't it true the install media ISOs are available indefinitely? And
if so the security cat is already out of the bag, so that's not a very
good argument. I'd say if we wanted to do something better it would be
an image that's usable for both VM and containers, and would be the
state of that version at the time it went EOL, i.e. it has all
available updates baked into it. And then de-emphasize the original
ISO as the way to run older versions of Fedora.


Chris Murphy

​I tend to agree with the rest of the choir here in saying we shouldn't make it easier for people to use EOL releases. It will likely add unnecessary burdens onto us and our systems when people come to ask about EOL Fedora releases in Docker. Not to mention, we should be encouraging people to move up, not stay put.

Honestly, I think if people need a platform that lasts a long time, they should be looking at CentOS with EPEL, SCLs, and/or other repos depending on what they need.​


--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux