On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 07:39 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:30:40 +0200
> > Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> > > Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64
> > > !=
> > > polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686
> >
> > This is due to polkit splitting out a polkit-libs package between
> > those
> > two versions. This makes it only include the polkit-libs package
> > instead of a polkit.i686.
> >
> > You should be able to just remove the old polkit.i686, but I agree
> > it
> > needs to be handed by the package cleanly for upgrades.
>
> Oops. Is there a way to handle this cleanly at all? I can’t just do
> polkit-libs.i686 Obsoletes: polkit.i686, that would break 32-bit-only
> systems.
> Mirek
The clean way to handle this is for the polkit package to have:
Requires: polkit-libs%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
This will guarantee that the new package has a polkit-libs package that
matches the currently-installed polkit. (And if you had both before,
you'll get both after, too).Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
