On 02.07.2015 17:56, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 10:33 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:55 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: >>>> * AGREED: Netizen is not approved as spin. We approve the option >>>> to >>>> have netizen as optional suite in anaconda. Please work with >>>> Workstation WG. (+7, 0, -0) (thozza, 18:48:50) >>> >>> Hi, maybe there was some misunderstanding about the Workstation >>> installer, but we don't allow configuration of package selection. >>> Users >>> are expected to use GNOME Software once the system is up and running. >> >> There were two combined statements there. The first was that we would >> consider making certain netizen-oriented options available at install >> -time. The second is that we would prefer to see tooling and >> configuration done inside the Workstation, KDE (and other?) >> environments rather than as a separate spin. > > The Workstation live installer doesn't have any installation options. > The UI isn't even present in the installer. It's a single payload, all > or nothing. It would have to be done as a group in GNOME Software. How is the Live installer different from the network installer? Is it just some configuration thing, or are those completely different installers? It looked like regular Anaconda last time I installed Workstation. I'm just trying to understand if you don't want to give the user the option to choose the installation options from live CD on purpose (due to user experience or such) or if there is some real issue? > The Workstation network installer has installation options. Regards, -- Tomas Hozza Software Engineer - EMEA ENG Developer Experience PGP: 1D9F3C2D Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
