On 06/02/2015 08:32 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] > about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That > discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle the naming for > all of this. > > The current questions are either using Fedora's namespace and just > making a new image (using Fedora ARM as an example), this would be the > "FROM" line for a Dockerfile > > FROM fedora/armhfp > > Which would then contain all the standard tags for latest, rawhide, f22, etc. > > Or alternatively, have each architecture maintain their own namespace > within the Hub which would look a little more like: > > FROM fedora-arm > > I'm personally a fan of the first option because it keeps things under > the Fedora umbrella and also allows for flexibility of aarch64, POWER, > etc as Docker supports more architectures. However the one thing I see > there that could be problematic is the possibility for users to be > confused if they don't search on the Docker Hub webUI and see the > associated documentation highlighting that the base image is for a > different architecture but instead just search from the docker command > line and end up with an image that won't run. > > Looking forward to feedback on the topic. Is there any agreement on the naming scheme ? > > Thanks, > -AdamM > > [0] - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2015-June/009526.html > -- Regards, Pradipta -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
