----- Original Message ----- > From: "Miroslav Suchý" <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:30:22 AM > Subject: Re: Mass bug filing proposal - switching to Python3 > > Dne 1.7.2015 v 15:33 Robert Kuska napsal(a): > > I would like to start with Mass bug filing process and as stated > > at wiki, the first step is to gain consensus for what I want to make. > > I maintain several python applications, but not all python libraries are > available for python3 yet. > Just few weeks ago I filed BZ "please provide python3 subpackage" for several > libraries as the python3 subpackage > neither exist yet nor it was reported yet. > > Can you rather file BZs for all python libraries which does not provide > python3 library yet? And start filing > application BZs only where all (or at least most) libraries will support > python3. I believe Robert's point is that once a bug is filled on an application, it is the application's maintainer's obligation to file any additional bugs that may be needes (Please let me know, if I understand it incorrectly, Robert). That said, I tend to agree that filing against both all applications and modules may be preferable, since we want as many packages as possible to support Python 3. Matt > For example absence of python3 support in ansible modules and > python-openstackclient is real blocker for me. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
