Re: Best practice for latest package in COPR?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 28, 2015 11:39 PM, "Miroslav Suchý" <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 29.6.2015 v 06:13 Dave Johansen napsal(a):
> > I would like to start providing the latest version of ODB in a COPR for stable releases of Fedora and RHEL. Is there a
> > "best practice" for this sort of thing?
> >
> > The main question I have is:
> > Is it "better" to use a single repo and continue to update it with the latest release?
> > Or is it better to have a repo for version 2.4 and then a separate one for when 2.5 comes out?
>
> It'is really up to you.
> It depends what you want to "support".
>
> It can be that you have project with latest stable version for all platforms (Fedora and Epel) so you provide 2.4
> version where in distribution is "just" 2.4. And then another project with nightly builds.
> This is what *I* would choose. So your users can choose their level of stability vs bleeding edge.

Ok thanks for the feedback.
Dave

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux