Dne 29.6.2015 v 16:20 Reindl Harald napsal(a): > > Am 29.06.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Vít Ondruch: >>> That doesn't really help, since the main advantage to this Change >>> Proposal is having a single package to update when fixes are needed, >>> but nearly all web applications take pieces of jQuery out and minify >>> them (taking only the parts they need in order to reduce download and >>> processing time to speed up execution). >> >> Honestly, how much web applications do we have packaged? >> >> And also, I am not convinced the the practice "take out some part of >> jQuery and minify it" is wort of the effort and is good practice, since >> that way, you probably avoid all caching mechanisms on the way from you >> server to the users browser. Of course the question is if the browsers >> are smart enough to keep cached single copy of jQuery once they download >> it .... > > the question is simple answered: caching is based on domain *and* URI > including all params, always, anywhere for proxies as well as for > browsers and no browser is in the position trying to be smart in that > context because any other behavior would be broken > > a web client is not allowed to say "hey, i have a /jquery.js in the > cache from application A and re-use it for application B" because that > would be *easy* attack vector If web client had a chance to say "hey, i have a /jquery.js in the cache from application A with checksum 'bla', I can reuse it for application B, since it request /jquery.js with the same checksum". Actually just checking checksums could be enough. But nobody implemented it yet I guess. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
