On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 14:49 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Chris Murphy < > lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yet this bug [1] is routinely voted > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 Not that > anyone should go try to make sense out of a three year old bug with > over 100 comments... but the gist is "nah, we don't want to fix it > now, therefore the release criteria don't matter". That is not an accurate summary. For F20 it was rejected as a Beta blocker and accepted as a Final blocker. It was addressed by preventing the installer from allowing /boot to be on a btrfs subvolume. For F21 anaconda actually allowed /boot on btrfs subvol; this wasn't intentional but an oversight, but no-one proposed it as a blocker for any 21 milestone and it slipped through. For F22 we handled it in the same way as F20: it was accepted as a blocker and considered addressed by preventing the installer from allowing /boot on btrfs. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
