Re: Btrfs as default filesystem for Fedora 23?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 14:49 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Chris Murphy <
> lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yet this bug [1] is routinely voted
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198  Not that
> anyone should go try to make sense out of a three year old bug with
> over 100 comments... but the gist is "nah, we don't want to fix it
> now, therefore the release criteria don't matter".

That is not an accurate summary. For F20 it was rejected as a Beta
blocker and accepted as a Final blocker. It was addressed by preventing
the installer from allowing /boot to be on a btrfs subvolume. For F21
anaconda actually allowed /boot on btrfs subvol; this wasn't
intentional but an oversight, but no-one proposed it as a blocker for
any 21 milestone and it slipped through. For F22 we handled it in the
same way as F20: it was accepted as a blocker and considered addressed
by preventing the installer from allowing /boot on btrfs.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux