On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 13:23 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > What the version of v8 will be? I am asking, since rubygem > > -therubyracer > > is using system version of v8 and I am bit afraid what impact it > > will have. > > 3.28.73 for nodejs 0.12, 4.2.77.13 for iojs. > > Looks like rubygem-therubyracer is still on 3.16. :-( > > I don't mind doing a v8-3.14 compat package for a few Fedora > releases, > since I'm still going to be maintaining it in EPEL for the forseeable > future anyway... > > > How is Chromium compatible with the updated Node.js (not user of > > Chromium though, neither it is in Fedora AFAIK). > > Not at all, nor has it been ever, nor will it be ever. Last time I > checked spot didn't even bother separating v8 from chromium anymore, > it's gotten so bad. :-/ > > > And since the two questions above, I am not sure it should not be > > system > > wide change (not mentioning all the nodejs- packages which depends > > on > > Node.js). > > Well the nodejs-* packages are clearly within our SIG, which the > Change policy says is okay for Self-Contained Change. > > The v8 changes do affect two other packages, though. I could adjust > the category of the wiki page, or split out the v8 changes from > io.js/nodejs012 into a v8 systemwide one. But the change deadline > was > yesterday, is this still okay? > I'll indicate to FESCo that we should consider the Node.js update to be system-wide when we discuss it at the meeting next week. I don't think it's worth separating into two Change Proposals considering it doesn't change the work being done, really. > -T.C. > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Dne 24.6.2015 v 01:37 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > > > -- Update v8 > > > > > > > What the version of v8 will be? I am asking, since rubygem > > -therubyracer > > is using system version of v8 and I am bit afraid what impact it > > will have. > > > > How is Chromium compatible with the updated Node.js (not user of > > Chromium though, neither it is in Fedora AFAIK). > > > > And since the two questions above, I am not sure it should not be > > system > > wide change (not mentioning all the nodejs- packages which depends > > on > > Node.js). > > > > > > Vít > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
