Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:20 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > NetworkManager is pure network configuration manager in this scenario.
> > We don't expect nor want NM to handle /etc/resolv.conf. We will only get
> > the current network configuration from it and act upon it. NM
> > configuration will contain "dns=unbound".
> 
> Another integration concern: the network config GUI (and ifcfg files,
> for that matter) let me list specific DNS servers. With this
> feature, are those used (and if so, how)? If not, is my configuration
> just silently ignored?

NM will use those DNS servers as it always has, and with dns=unbound
will simply forward them to unbound, which will use your servers as the
upstream servers.  Basically, any information that NM used to write to
resolv.conf will now instead get forwarded to unbound.

What unbound wants to do with it is another story, of course, that I'm
not an expert on but Thomas/Paul/etc are.

Dan

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux