Josh Boyer wrote on 12.06.2015 13:55: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > As I said, there are no great solutions here. A "works most of the time"-solution would be: Install kernel-devel by default. But I'm not seriously suggesting that, because I fully agree: It's not a great solution. Did anyone(¹) look at soft dependencies in rpm? Can they make our tools install the kernel-devel packages in the variants that match the kernel variants installed? I suspect they are made to solve problems like this, but I'm not sure; and I don't know how far soft dependencies are supported in out current stack of packaging tools. CU knurd (¹) no, I'm not looking at you Josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
