On Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:02:30 AM Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > There was recently a thread on the Fedora ARM mailing list[0] > about getting a Fedora ARM image into the official Docker Hub. That > discussion lead down the trail of how to best handle the naming for > all of this. > > The current questions are either using Fedora's namespace and just > making a new image (using Fedora ARM as an example), this would be the > "FROM" line for a Dockerfile > > FROM fedora/armhfp > > Which would then contain all the standard tags for latest, rawhide, f22, > etc. > > Or alternatively, have each architecture maintain their own namespace > within the Hub which would look a little more like: > > FROM fedora-arm > > I'm personally a fan of the first option because it keeps things under > the Fedora umbrella and also allows for flexibility of aarch64, POWER, > etc as Docker supports more architectures. However the one thing I see > there that could be problematic is the possibility for users to be > confused if they don't search on the Docker Hub webUI and see the > associated documentation highlighting that the base image is for a > different architecture but instead just search from the docker command > line and end up with an image that won't run. I think I prefer the first option also. fedora/armhfp fedora/ppc64 fedora/ppc64le fedora/s390x fedora/i386 Regards Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
