On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 21:49 -0500, Michael Tiemann wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 21:44, Dag Wieers wrote: > > > Only fork SPEC files when the complexity of maintaining them becomes > > harder than the complexity of keeping things synchronised. > > > > My estimate is that for 70% of the cases 1 SPEC file can rule them all. > > That would be _extremely_ cool. The emphasize is misplaced _would_ would have been correct. Being involved into packaging cross-distribution rpms for many years, experience tells me, you can achieve a 90-percent solution this way easily, however the rest is almost impossible to resolve. Ralf
