On Thu, 28 May 2015 17:32:24 -0400 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:05:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > In some kind of ideal world it would be great if rawhide was the > > rolling release and people who liked that model could use it day to > > day. (Which is really already the case, but things do break so you > > need to be good at troubleshooting and/or have alternatives in case > > the thing you normally use breaks). > > Well, and as someone just pointed out to me, fairly enough, on Reddit, > Rawhide is often a rolling release of the latest prerelease dev > versions of software, and we don't really have a rolling release of > the latest stable versions (except to the extent that people push > these as updates, which is quite a lot). Sure, agreed. Although there's a lot of stable releases of things that flow into rawhide too in cases where upstream doesn't have a development branch or the maintainer(s) decide something is not stable enough. Of course gnome, kernel, mesa and such are prereleases a good part of the time. kevin
Attachment:
pgpKz7vSzQnN4.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
