Marcin:
Oh. You said you upgraed to Rawhide. But you seems not actually using Rawhide repos.On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Robin Lee <cheeselee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marcin:You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade ffmpeg-libs'.There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released, you are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22 released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum repo configs are updated in new version of rpmfusion-free-release. So, if you run a global 'dnf upgrade' before upgrade rpmfusion-free-release, you will pull in some 'rawhide' packages from RPMFusion.-roibnOn Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiewicz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:F22 got released so I upgraded my machine from F22 to rawhide. But as usual it meant rebuilding rpmfusion packages (as they do not support rawhide).
All went quite good. Except installing:
Error: package ffmpeg-libs-2.6.2-3.fc23.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed.
Why's that?
libvpx 1.4.0 bumped libvpx.so.1 -> libvpx.so.2 and I did not found any mail about it on fedora-devel ML (maybe such mails are not required, no idea - many such were sent). Most of rawhide is built against libvpx 1.3.0 so old soname is required.
Simple 'dnf remove "libvpx.so.1()(64bit)"' on my rawhide shows 512 packages including wine, kde, gstreamer plugins and lot of other stuff.
How to solve it? I am afraid that answer would be "wait 2 months, we will slowly solve it by new uploads" ;(
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
