On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:55:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> Fedora 20 will reach end of life on 2015-06-23, and no further updates >> will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent >> release of Fedora 22, no new packages will be added to the Fedora 20 >> collection. > > So, here's a question.... With F21 released December 9, but F23 > scheduled for October*, if we go with the normal one month overlap, > that means the total F21 livespan will be only 11 months. We often tell > people that the "n+1 + 1 month" scheme means the normal supported time > is about 13 months. This next time around, do we want to say "and > 'about' sometimes means 11!", or do we instead want to EOL in December > (or even January)? > > As is often the case, I can see benefits either way. Stick with n+1+1 month. Extending a little used release for another 2 months just seems like a lot of work for little gain. Those that were going to upgrade likely already have, those that aren't likely won't care either way. To put it another way, we didn't drop F20 support at 13 months when the F21 cycle ran long. It's been "supported" for well over that at this point. I suggest we stick with the formula and stop trying to make things more complicated. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
