Re: Rapid release for security updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I totally agree with Jared, just becuase oyu don't see the logic doesn't mean it needs repealed.

Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
(p) 310.909.7672

Tutoring in person or via any of the following platforms:

{PayPal,Google Wallet/Play store, Apple Pay}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
pub  3072D/718BF597 2014-12-08 
      Key fingerprint = 2930 99EB 083D D332 0752 88C4 E958 C5D6 718B F597
uid     Corey Sheldon (Fedora Key) <sheldon.corey@xxxxxxxxx>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jared K. Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The "update stability policies" enforced by Bodhi simply need to be
repealed.
 
I completely disagree... the checks and balances that are in place are there for a reason, and aren't too difficult to satisfy in the case of a security update.  Completely repealing the requirements would be a gross overreaction.

--
Jared Smith

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux