It's 7 years, not 5. M On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:45, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 19:27 +0100, Féliciano Matias wrote: > > > Le jeudi 16 décembre 2004 à 00:44 -0500, seth vidal a écrit : > > > > Want to be REAL sure you notice this: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/magazine/002dec04/departments/fedora_status/ > > > > > > > > > > > > That's Right CVS is open - you need to run, don't walk, to: > > > > > > > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > RHEL extras ? > > > > That's decidedly off-topic for this list. > > > > Ask on taroon list. > > In essence it's not off-topic. FC3 turns into RHEL4, it makes no sense to > make the Extras Fedora-specific. Even when RHEL is not a community > product. > > Of course, Fedora Extras has a 6 months life-time and memory span, if you > think about RHEL packages, you think about at least 5 years and at least 3 > concurrent versions to support. > > -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] > > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
