Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 May 2015 14:59:11 +0200
Timotheus Pokorra <timotheus.pokorra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > what we (in secondary arches) primarily need is the decision how to
> > proceed - incremental rebuild over 3.4 or complete rebootstrap.
> > Naturally we prefer the complete rebootstrap as it allows bringing
> > up new arches. And because we are in no way Mono experts, we would
> > appreciate the procedure how to do the bootstrap (eg. in form of a
> > srpm). If needed we can give you access to the various secondary
> > arch machines. Copr can't help here unfortunately.
> I think a complete rebootstrap would be the easiest for everyone.
> Otherwise we would need to upgrade from Mono 2.10 to Mono 3.4 to Mono
> 3.12 to Mono 4. This is just too much rebuilding of packages.
> 
> A recent SRPM is available here:
> https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mono-4.0.1-3.fc21.src.rpm
> (linked from latest build of Mono at
> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/tpokorra/mono/monitor/)

first update
srpm builds fine on f22/s390x
mono segfaults when running monolite on f22/ppc64
build runs well on f22/ppc64le (new arch) after adding ppc64le to the
ExclusiveArch list


		Dan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux