Re: Unison in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think Fedora should have a single "unison" source package, and it
> should contain the multiple upstream branch sources and build
> different binary subpackages.  The binary subpackages would have the
> same names as now (unison227 etc), making this a compatible update for
> existing Fedora Unison users.
> 
> This way I only need to submit a single new package review, we can
> delete the unison2xx source packages, and there'll be a single place
> for unison in Fedora for ever more.

This seems like a sane plan to me, given the circumstances. (It's
really too bad that newer versions don't _themselves_ have a compat
mode, but oh well.) I suppose this would need a special exception from
FPC.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux