On 6.5.2015 10:21, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It depends on the meaning of the upstream's `-1'. Basically, I would
interpret it as yet another version level, i.e. as `3.80.1'. If the upstream
tends to release `3.80.1-1', I'd interpret `3.80-1' as `3.80.0.1'.
So, what would the rpm be named? foo-3.80.1-1.rpm or foo-3.80-1-1.rpm?
Definitely foo-3.80-1-1.rpm is bad idea. How will you parse NVRA here?
Naming of packages is now simply *name-v-r.a*
or *name-e:v-r.a*, where only *name* can contains dashes. Other dashes
are separators.
Is the latter a possibility?
In this case, I do not think there is ever going to be another
release, so I just have to worry about my own re-release names for
each patch and spec file update. The vendor was quite specific in
their wording, the version is 3.80 and the release is 1. These are the
names of the packages on their website:
foo-source-3.80-1.tar.gz
foo-3.80-1.rpm
foo-3.80-1.deb
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
