On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 22:32 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:12:32 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > > > >>I noticed xv is also included, does that mean that it is ok to package > >>not 100% oss software, I'm especially thinking about free (as in > >>beer)/gratis, with sourcecode, but not for commercial use, without any > >>further redistribution limitations. > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2004-December/msg00084.html > > > > Ah, > > Thanks for the heads up, and what does this mean for other non 100% oss > software not a chance or does it depend on the wording of the license, > or .... ? > > To bad xv will be removed again, xv is a great tool and I think many > people would like it being available through yum. > It's been removed now. -sv
