On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:20 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/01/2015 02:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 19:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > > Adam Williamson composed on 2015-04-30 16:37 (UTC-0700): > > > > > > > I'd prefer objective analysis over anecdata. poettering's > > > > contention > > > > is : > > > > > > > i) there is only a problem if you have time-based fsck enabled > > > > ii) this is not the default > > > > > > > your anecdote does not provide enough information to prove or > > > > disprove > > > > his contention. > > > > > > He never mentioned what time-based fsck is that I saw, > > > > "What doesn't work is rtc-in-local in early-boot, that's all. And > > that > > doesn't matter really, except if you are crazy enough to manually > > enable time-based fsck in ext234, which has been turned off by > > default > Wrong. > > Even on f21, setting the "The sixth field" of the line referring to > "/" > (root) to "!= 0" in /etc/fstab is sufficient to provoke this bug in > "rtc-in-local" configuration. > > May-be you (testing) should add a release blocking testsuite for > "rtc-in-local"? As described, this does not constitute a release-blocking bug. We already have a test for 'clean default install alongside Windows', which is what the release criteria require to work. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
