On 04/27/2015 04:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 27 April 2015 at 15:33, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think it would make sense to keep ABI compatibility with the old >> soname for one Fedora release, just to give 3rd parties time to >> transition over. I could help making an ABI compat package for this if >> you agree it makes sense? > > From my point of view, this is a great idea. Without a compat package > we can expect weeks of pain. Nettle doesn't use symbol versions, so having two versions of that library in the same process could have interesting effects. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct