Re: qt5 as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Antti J=?iso-8859-1?B?5A==?=rvinen wrote:

> There is also same decision to make regarding libraries that have not been
> re-packaged to support both qt4 and qt5. One good example is
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/qjson/
> -> there is no separate binary package libqjson-qt5 and libqjson-qt4. The
> library from source works all right with both but if the library is
> built and linked against qt4, it can also be used to build application
> that links against qt5 and everything goes all right. Only downside is
> immediate SIGSEGV when you invoke methods from the library :)

For libraries that support both, the general best practice is to change 
library soname for Qt5 builds, to ensure the scenarios you describe doesn't 
happen accidentally.

-- Rex

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux