I left off two pieces 6. Fedora Docker Hub images, and 7. CentOS Docker Hub images, which are vastly more popular than the Fedora ones. On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:49 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Agreed - it's too late to change anything for F22. But moving forward, > I think there's a discussion that needs to happen about the > inter-relationships of the various projects associated with "Cloud": > > 1. OpenShift Origin > 2. RHEL Atomic > 3. Fedora Atomic > 4. CentOS Atomic > 5. fedora-dockerfiles > > and the underlying upstreams - Docker and Kubernetes. Some questions: > > 1. Will OpenShift Origin ever be distributed via Fedora? > 2. Will CentOS Atomic always be independent of both Fedora Atomic and > RHEL Atomic? > 3. Will there always be three forums for interaction with the > fedora-dockerfiles project (GitHub issues, Cloud Trac and RedHat > Bugzilla?) > > I note that many of the pieces here are clearly marked as "for > developers - not ready for production". So the over-arching question > for me as a user/developer is, "When *will* they be ready for > production?" > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 04/09/2015 02:37 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> On Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:07:55 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>>> On 04/08/2015 06:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>>> the docker base image is part of the Base WG. so it seems wrong to put it >>>>> on the Cloud page, but we should do something to advertise it more. >>>> >>>> But there's no Base WG page or anything... I know it's sitting there >>>> now, but I don't think end users care about which working group does it. >>>> >>>> Conceptually, it seems to me to fit with Cloud. Other suggestions welcome. >>>> >>>> I'm also curious whether there should be some closer collaboration >>>> between base wg and cloud on the container image(s)? >>> >>> there probably should be closer collaboration, it started under the cloud WG >>> and was moved to the Base WG. I do not really mind where it sits, but it >>> should not go flip flopping. >> >> OK. And apologies for contributing to that, but we're all still figuring >> things out there. >> >> I suppose the best answer for now is to ride out the F22 release as-is >> and see about changing for F23 and forward? >> >> Best, >> >> jzb >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst >> jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ >> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ >> >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > > > -- > OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists > http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-journalists > > Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday. -- OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-journalists Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
