>>>>> "EM" == Elder Marco <eldermarco@xxxxxxxxx> writes: EM> So, upstream recommends to deal with "plowshare" core only, which it EM> is quite stable. And I agree. Well, look at how clamav does it. The package provides a snapshot of the virus data so that we can ship _something_. This will be updated when freshclam runs. EM> So, the question is: Am I violating Fedora Packaging Guidelines if I EM> do not provide the modules into fedora repositories? Perhaps read over https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not_useful_without_external_bits Personally, I would still ship a module package, but for that to work, the software has to have a mechanism for local downloads to override system-provided modules. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
