On 10. 4. 2015 at 15:34:53, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/10/2015 02:03 PM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 01:54:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> So check-update might be useful for some script, but it is not useful > >> command for common user. Not mentioning that man page basically says: > >> "Please note that having a specific newer version available for an > >> installed package (and reported by check-update) does not imply that > >> subsequent dnf upgrade will install it. The difference is that dnf > >> upgrade must also ensure the satisfiability of all dependencies and > >> other restrictions". In other words, it says it is more or less > >> unreliable command. > > > > If you want to reliable force an update to the newest packages, > > use 'dnf upgrade --best'. > > Except of people, who prefer not receiving updates/bugfixes and want to > live with an outdated system, it's what everybody will want. I've been using just `dnf update` to update my system for almost a year now and there is not a single package on my system that is not updated to the latest version in the repo. Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
