Re: dnf replacing yum and dnf-yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-- snip --

> I would venture a comment that it was a mistake to declare dnf a
> separate project, because it leads to a different approach to such
> differences. If it was an evolutionary change in yum, it would be
> natural to expect it to behave in a compatible way, and consequently
> detect and explain in more detail the divergent behavior. By declaring a
> clean break, you are basically saying that there is no need to explain
> the diffs, but the flip side of it is that unless I can clearly
> understand why the difference is for the better, I must suspect this to
> be a regression and report it.

To address this general concern, dnf actually has an extensive documentation 
that describes the expected differences:

http://dnf.readthedocs.org/en/latest/

-- snip --


Thanks
Jan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux