Re: How to build one TeXLive subpackage for EPEL-7?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-04-08, 01:06 GMT, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Just package it separately.  They should all have proper upstream
> tarballs, and there's no reason not to just make individual packages if
> that's what you need.  And, hey, while you're at it, stick them in
> rawhide and make the texlive package not generate them at all.  Anything
> that gets split out of texlive into proper packages is a win.

Cutting up texlive monster piece by piece seems like rather 
lousy idea to me. After all that long thread about texlive which 
just happened here I am afraid dealing with the monster must be 
done in some more sensible and organized matter.

Anyway, I'll try to make a special EPEL package for it.

Matěj
-- 
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB  25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
 
Don't anthropomorphize computers.  They don't like it.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux