Dne 30.3.2015 v 22:17 Neil Horman napsal(a): > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: >>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: >>>>> There are currently no flags set at all. >>>> Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link). >>> Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how >>> to get rid of it, although I think it should clear out all requests >>> for closed bugs. >> This in practice isn't a safe assumption. People do legitimately >> discuss closed bugs, including requesting and providing information. >> "Closed" does not always imply "no further discussion is needed or >> desired". > I would assert the opposite to be true. That is to say a state of "closed" by > definition implies that a bug no longer needs discussion or consideration. In > the converse, a bug that is still receiving updates in the form of comments, > likely should not be in the state "closed". Is "Thank you" comment allowed after the bug is closed? Vít > > Neil > >> -- >> Adam Williamson >> Fedora QA Community Monkey >> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net >> http://www.happyassassin.net >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct