On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > > > > > On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There are currently no flags set at all. > > > > > > > > Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link). > > > > > > Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how > > > to get rid of it, although I think it should clear out all > > > requests > > > for closed bugs. > > > > This in practice isn't a safe assumption. People do legitimately > > discuss closed bugs, including requesting and providing > > information. > > "Closed" does not always imply "no further discussion is needed or > > desired". > > I would assert the opposite to be true. That is to say a state of > "closed" by > definition implies that a bug no longer needs discussion or > consideration. In > the converse, a bug that is still receiving updates in the form of > comments, > likely should not be in the state "closed". Dictating use of BZ is usually a futile effort, in Fedora. We have a policy on it which is in practice rarely observed by anyone. What should or should not be the cause is pretty much moot: what *is* the case is that it makes sense to some of our BZ users to not treat CLOSED in the way you advocate. BZ is, fundamentally, a tool, and tools usually get used in the way that makes sense to the user. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct