The end result would be that we don't show applications that have failed the previous two releases mass rebuilds in GNOME Software i.e. we don't show f19 packages in f21, and we don't show f20 packages in f22. Should be pretty non-controversial, right? The kind of software that failed two rebuilds in a row really and is sitting unloved by the downstream maintainer isn't really the kind of software we want to show. They would still of course be installable on the command line using dnf. Speak now, or forever hold your peace, thanks. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
