Re: Captive portal detection on wired connections - bug or feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:52 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this
> > > evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there
> > > were some config issues with some of them. ;( 
> > > 
> > > This would have only affected some folks in North America sporadically,
> > > (when they happened to hit a proxy that wasn't working right) not
> > > everyone. 
> > > 
> > > Sorry this happened, everything should be back to normal now. 
> > 
> > I think it would make sense to do a second ping to some other server if
> > the first one to fedoraproject.org fails, for robustness. Maybe to
> > redhat.com, or something that should never be down like google.com (my
> > vote), or to someplace that promises not to track users, like
> > duckduckgo.com (hardly matters much for a connectivity check?).
> 
> We could always use the Google servers that Android uses by default,
> instead of Fedora :)  Those would be pretty well guaranteed to be up...

You might use both so you have less chances of false positive, but
*please* make it uninstallable, or easily disableable.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux